Last night I dropped off the guitar at Long & McQuade. We’ll have to see the results to see if it’s worth spending $90 on.
Mike brought up a good point that you have to have a pretty nice (read: expensive) guitar to justify a $90 tune up. One would think you wouldn’t spend that on your $300 guitar. However, I must admit that the old Yamaha has a special place in my heart so maybe it will be the next guitar to get set up.
Today’s topic of conversation revolves around music. Fancy that.
What I would like to discuss are the differences between music releases in the 60s-70s and nowadays. Yes, I am purposely leaving out the 80s.
I am going through the Top 500 Rock Songs of all time and clearly, the majority of them stem from the late 60s – 70s period. I come across many songs by many of the same artists (like Zeppelin, Floyd, etc.) but I noticed a common trend.
Their albums pretty well came out one year after the other. It wasn’t uncommon to see an album come out in ’70, ’71, ’72. Whereas nowadays, I think the norm is every 2 years, give a few extra if you’re an old band who just want to tour every five years (or don’t have enough creative juices).
So, the question is, did they really release a heck of a lot more music for the masses back in the day?
Let’s take a look at the elements of a classic rock album vs. a new album. Mainly – track numbers.
It was very common to see around 8 tracks back in the day on an album, whereas I would think it’s common to see an average of 14 songs nowadays. That’s nearly double, but not quite.
For my thesis here, I will use Led Zeppelin as my classic rock example, and Our Lady Peace as my 90’s example. I will also use a five year span to develop the procedure which will demonstrate the song writing ability of these two bands.
Led Zeppelin I (1969) – 9 songs
Led Zeppelin II (1969 – note that these two albums were released in the SAME year!) – 9 songs
Led Zeppelin III (1970) – 10 songs
Led Zeppelin IV (1971) – 8 songs
House of the Holy (1973) – 8 songs
Total – 44 songs
Naveed (1994) – 11 songs
Clumsy (1997) – 11 songs
Happiness is Not A Fish You Can Catch (1999) – 11 songs
Total – 33 songs
Now, of course, my formula could be off severely. If you take the Smashing Pumpkins against Led Zeppelin, then we are looking at a total of 51 songs being released on albums during a five year period. That’s pretty impressive. Heck, that’s why I like them. Plus, can we say that Led Zeppelin may have been abnormal in that they could create a heck of a lot of songs compared to other bands at the time? Unsure.
On average, if I did a more thorough analysis we would find that there are more songs released by a band in the past than in the present.
Then we get into the whole debate about ‘quality vs. quantity’. I have heard the argument that back in the day, people just released whatever they came up with and some of it was lackluster (aka, not single worthy). So there’s a an argument that you can spend 2 years now and ween through the crap that you would release on album.
However, I disagree with this standpoint as there is still crap coming out on albums, so why don’t you just release everything you enjoy recording at the moment, and if 2 weeks down the line you hate it, so be it. At least you tried. Something tells me this is the point where I will hear from people who just enjoy the singles anyhow and prefer grabbing their favourite tracks off an album instead of listening to the album as a whole.
What am I getting at with my commentary? I want more music from my current artists. An album every year I say! Especially now with the Internet, there’s no reason to wait around until you have 12 songs available. Re-enter the land of singles and then release a few compilation albums every few years.
So my question to all of you is this – do you feel that there was a lot more music being produced in the past? How do you feel about waiting an average of 2 years to hear a new album (which, could be crap)?
This leads into my review of the new Finger Eleven album – Them Vs. You Vs. Me. While it has some alright tunes, it is a different direction. Think ‘One Thing’ but multiply it by 12 and you have their new album. What the heck lads? Disappointment ensues for this gent who has been waiting for a rocking album.
Plus, your album is 30 minutes long. Two years of waiting should at least produce 45 minutes of music.
3 replies on “Then Vs. Now”
You might also want to look at the track length to determine how much music was released.
Also with Zepplin and Floyd, you might also want to look at the lyrics, how many words in a song. Zepplin and Floyd loved instrumentals.
There are probably other factors I am missing, depth of the lyrics maybe, but I can’t think of any way to measure that.
Internet.. how much has that changed the way you listen to …copy… ( music and video ) and purchase music….I find that too many musicians new and old are using filler songs just to create an album or slide on the coatstrings of a “hit ” tune to sell the NEXT BIG album.
Too many musicians work out a lump sum deal.. meaning paid up front for work to be done in the future giving up some of their royalty rights in exchange for cash up front. This weakens the music.
Cost of music is unfair, overpriced and non competitive.
Lets not get into concert ticket pricing LOL….
No kidding. Let’s all hear it for Roger Waters charging $150 to see him.